Topic: Conclusion And Bibliography
Continued from Metaphysics Research Work Part 2 (F)
CONCLUSION
By the above discussion of philosophical views, and the contrast of the understanding of different philosophers about logic, a better understanding about logic can be developed. Logics do not meant to be reasons itself, but these are formulations to reach an ending or consequence. Logic is very effective as far as the sciences of computer, mathematical models, operation research and robotics are concerned. But when it comes to societal applications as in the subject of sociology, psychology and others, there are many factors beyond the scope of logics and logical instruments.
There are some limitations in logic, the opinion about logic that it does not necessarily reason well as of Thomas Hofweber and others are more convincing and forceful, because for examples that we have regarding the society, norms and human relationships the logical ideas appeared as failure. It is because logic is just an instrument for reaching a conclusion and such humanitarian subjects are so complex systems that logic cannot encompass the relationship in between and factorial entities that rests within those relationships.
The relationship in logics and human societies should be developed further, but logic should not be applied everywhere. In some cases and realities feasibility analysis and rational thinking helps a lot while logic fails, whereas in the subjects that are concerned with algorithm with decision making logic can be helpful.
The research work is made by SM Waqas Imam, he is a fresh engineer and has graduated from NED university of engineering and technology in 2010.
Bibliography
Aristotle. Prior Analytics. Trans. A. J. Jenkinson. n.d.
Empiricus, Sextus. Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Trans. R.G. Bury. Loeb edn. London: W. Heinemann, 1933.
Frege, G. Logic. 1897.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Organon. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organon>.
Gensler, Harry. Introduction to Logic. Routledge, 2002.
Joyce, G.H. Principles of Logic. London, 1908.
McCosh, J. The Laws of Discursive Thought. London, 1870.
Poinsot, J. Outlines of Formal Logic. ed. and transl. F.C. Wade. 1955.
Watts, I. Logick. 1725.
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Problem of induction. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction#cite_note-2>.
Associated Parts Of The Paper:
Topic: Conclusion And Bibliography
Topic: The Reliability of Logics in the Perspective of Ancient and Modern Philosophers Part 2 (F)
Topic: The Reliability of Logics in the Perspective of Ancient and Modern Philosophers Part 2 (E)
Topic: The Reliability of Logics in the Perspective of Ancient and Modern Philosophers Part 2 (D)
Topic: The Reliability of Logics in the Perspective of Ancient and Modern Philosophers Part 2 (C)
Topic: The Reliability of Logics in the Perspective of Ancient and Modern Philosophers Part 2 (B)
Topic: The Reliability of Logics in the Perspective of Ancient and Modern Philosophers Part 2 (A)